The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA)
invites proposals to develop, demonstrate, and evaluate high efficiency
lighting products. Proposals should be clearly labeled A (Product
Development) or B (Demonstration and Evaluation). Examples of technologies
eligible for support include:
NYSERDA will make multiple awards up to $200,000 per project. A minimum of $600,000 is dedicated to A and B projects seeking to develop innovative and promising technologies that do not yet have wide market penetration, including, but not limited to, technology areas listed above. Funds may be used to support A) design, testing, development, and commercialization of new technologies or substantial improvements to existing technologies, or B) demonstration and evaluation of commercially available technologies or promising prototype technologies. Category B projects must include evaluation and information dissemination activities and, if not yet commercially available, an intent to commercialize based on the results of the evaluation. New product development proposals and proposals to evaluate not-yet-commercialized technologies must address how the technology/system will be introduced into widespread commercial use. Basic or fundamental research is not eligible under this solicitation. All product development proposals must be cost-shared, with 50% cofunding or above preferred. Cost-sharing for demonstration and evaluation projects is not a requirement for temporary installations. Projects involving permanent installations must cost-share a portion of equipment and installation costs. Proposals to demonstrate and evaluate commercially available technologies may be also eligible for financial incentives under other NYSERDA programs listed on our website (http://www.nyserda.org/rddopps.html). The proposed work must seek to demonstrate/yield quantifiable
energy benefits, have substantial New York State impact, and produce
significant economic benefits such as reduced energy consumption and
job creation. Associated environmental benefits and significant non-energy
benefits are also important evaluation criteria. Proposals* must clearly labeled and submitted to: Karen Whalen, PON 629-01 __________ I. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS Submit ten (10) hard copies of the proposal in the following format:
II. PROPOSAL EVALUATION Proposals that meet all the Proposal Requirements will be reviewed and ranked for technical merit, program merit, and cost-value relationship, including cost-sharing or cofunding, by a Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) consisting of NYSERDA staff and selected outside reviewers. Proposals will be scored according to the following technical criteria listed in order of importance. Proposed Work - Does the proposed work result in a new and improved product or system, or provide critical information about an innovative product or system? Does the product/system replace an old product/system or address a market need? Is the proposed work unique and/or innovative, well-conceived, and technologically feasible? Is the development or demonstration strategy sound? New York State Benefits - Does the project result in quantifiable energy savings? Does a significant portion of the proposed activity occur in New York State? Does the proposed work lead to New York State economic growth and/or yield environmental benefits? Does the team include New York State organization(s)? Does a significant portion of the proposed activity occur in New York State? Statement of Work - Is the Statement of Work comprehensive, realistic, explicit, and consistent with the proposal requirements? Does the Statement of Work outline a well-conceived course of action? Are staff allocations and schedule reasonable? Resulting Technologies/Products/Evaluations- Do the results advance the present know-how? Are the resulting technologies, products, or design strategies marketable? Is the project outcome implementation strategy, such as commercialization, marketing, technology-transfer, etc. well-conceived and sound? Does the proposal address "sharing of project success" requirements? Proposer(s) - Do the technical and management/business teams have the relevant and necessary technical and business background and experience, respectively? Does the team show a balance of technical, operations, marketing and administrative expertise? Does the team demonstrate resourcefulness, cooperation and teamwork? Cost Criteria Other Considerations - Projects will be reviewed to determine if they reflect NYSERDA's overall objectives. The considerations include:
III. GENERAL CONDITIONS Proprietary Information The New York State Freedom of Information Law, Public Officers Law, Article 6, provides for public access to information NYSERDA possesses. Public Officers Law, Section 87(d) (2) provides for exceptions to disclosure for records or portions thereof that "are trade secrets or are submitted to an agency by a commercial enterprise or derived from information obtained from a commercial enterprise and which if disclosed would cause substantial injury to the competitive position of the subject enterprise." Information submitted to NYSERDA that the proposer wishes to have treated as proprietary, and confidential trade secret information should be identified and labeled "Confidential" or "Proprietary" on each page at the time of disclosure. This information should include a written request to except it from disclosure, including a written statement of the reasons why the information should be excepted. See procedure described in Public Officers law, Section 89(5). Minority-and Women-Owned Business Policy Information on the availability of New York State subcontractors and suppliers is available from: Empire State Development A directory of certified minority- and women-owned business enterprises is available from: Empire State Development Contract Award
|
|